Sip Registration showing Public IP vs Internal IP

Discuss any topic about Brekeke SIP Server.

Moderator: Brekeke Support Team

Post Reply
mdt19572
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:36 am
Location: Dublin, OH

Sip Registration showing Public IP vs Internal IP

Post by mdt19572 »

1. Brekeke Product Name and Version:
Brekeke SIP Server , Version 3.0.7.0/333 Standard
2. Java version:
1.6.0_18
3. OS type and the version:
Windows Server 2008 R2
4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved:
Zoiper
5. Your problem:

I have a subnet of 10.1.0.0 / 255.255.254.0

My server is 10.1.1.220 with "interface address 1" set to this as well.
My client(s) are 10.1.0.x

Under Registered clients I'm seeing my UA registered with my public ip address of the client network vs an internal ip address.

I'd like to keep everything on the internal network and assume I can do a Dial Plan to work around this but kind of lost on the syntax to use.

Thank You for any assistance.
Andrey
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm

Post by Andrey »

It will happen because the SIP client detects its global IP address for the firewall traversal.

Tune the SIP client's settings to disable the public IP address detection.
It will be STUN or ICE in the settings.


If you capture packets at SIP Server's PC, are SIP packets exchanged with the public IP address instead of the internal's?
mdt19572
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:36 am
Location: Dublin, OH

Post by mdt19572 »

Andrey wrote:It will happen because the SIP client detects its global IP address for the firewall traversal.

Tune the SIP client's settings to disable the public IP address detection.
It will be STUN or ICE in the settings.


If you capture packets at SIP Server's PC, are SIP packets exchanged with the public IP address instead of the internal's?
The packets are exchanged with internal but ends up with the external.

I've disabled STUN and it appears to be using the internal IP now, will test it out.

Thank You.
Andrey
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:30 pm

Post by Andrey »

It seems you solve the issue.
mdt19572
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2013 8:36 am
Location: Dublin, OH

Post by mdt19572 »

Andrey wrote:It seems you solve the issue.
It worked! Thanks again.
Post Reply