Changed line in matching pattern to this and it works now.

To = sip:(...)(.+)(.)@

I can see from the error log the To URI is ... I blanked out the actual IP address

sip:1102011@xx.xx.x.xx

I just placed a test call. Under the log file I see "No matched rules"... I checked under the history tab under the dial plan and there is nothing in there for this call.

Any ideas on this no matter what I try it says no matched rules. I tried changing the line to this below just as a test. Making it a fixed number of characters and even this says no matched rules.

$request = ^INVITE
To = sip:(...)(...)(.);phone-context

Just trying this rule today finally. I get an error no matching pattern.

okay great thank you

That is correct here are more examples.

103882940
103*88294*0

1015642
101*564*2

19945159
199*4515*9

thanks

1. Brekeke Product Name and Version: SIP Server 2. Java version: 3. OS type and the version: Windows 2008 4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved: CS1000 5. Your problem: In past when dialing back from CS1000 to Rauland R5 we have needed to insert an asterisk in the dial string ...

Yes I can call the mitel fine when I register directly to the brekeke and not through the firewall.

When I register through the firewall mitel says not found... but network trace shows the extension is correct. I assume it is because the brekeke shows the external ip to the mitel

1. Brekeke Product Name and version: Brekeke SIP Server 2. Java version: 3. OS type and the version: Windows 2003 Server 4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved: Mitel 5. Select your network pattern from http://www.brekeke-sip.com/bbs/network/networkpatterns.html : 6. Your problem ...

1. Brekeke Product Name and version: Brekeke SIP Server 2. Java version: 3. OS type and the version: Windows 2003 Server 4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved: Nortel 5. Select your network pattern from http://www.brekeke-sip.com/bbs/network/networkpatterns.html : 6. Your ...

No change... I have wireshark traces from both interfaces but I dont think I can attach them... to me it looks like it tries using a source address of 55.2 then repleces 55.2 with 103.50 but the user info is stripped and this is the problem... then the Mitel reports extension not found error.. Any ...

RTP relay is set to Auto

I see all three IP addresses on the status page

No change .. same issue

I dont think you are understanding the setup yet. probably my fault for not explaining it right... I have 2 phsically seperate networks network one 101 102 and 103 subnets Network two 55 subnet (nothing else) The brekeke server has 2 nic cards one connected to each physical network The bekeke can ...

Thanks for your input but that is not correct. Clients registered to the brekeke on the 103 interface can make calls to the mitel. As indicated my very first posts it is only clients registered on the 55 interface that can not call the Mitel.

The mitel is 192.168.102.50 the PBX is not registered in the SIP Server (not sure why it would be) No other dial plans... If call from any client registered to the brekeke on the mitel side of the network everything works fine.. if I call from the other side where the brekeke clients are the routing ...

192.168.103.50 - Lan with Mitel Phone Switch

192.168.55.2 - Seperate LAN with Sip Clients

Rules
Match
$request=^INVITE
To=sip:(4.+)@
Deploy
To=sip:(4.+)@ To=sip:%1@192.168.102.50

Yes they are local IP addresses

Yes I can see registered clients

Not sure about calls from Mitel to another client this is the reverse of what I am trying to do and is not tested yet

1. Brekeke Product Name and version: 2.3.8.2 2. Java version Not Sure where to find this 3. OS type and the version: 2003 server service pack 2 4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved: Brekeke and Mitel 5. Select your network pattern from http://www.brekeke-sip.com/bbs/network ...