Because Java 16 is not LTS (Long-Term-Support) version, Java 11 is recommended.
FYI:
https://www.oracle.com/java/technologie ... admap.html
Search found 336 matches
- Sun Jun 06, 2021 8:05 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Brekeke SIP Server and Java 16?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5033
- Sun Jun 06, 2021 8:02 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Updating Java in Linux Installation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4774
- Fri Mar 26, 2021 9:26 am
- Forum: Brekeke PBX Forum
- Topic: WebRTC - 603 Decline
- Replies: 10
- Views: 20321
- Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:22 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Is it possible to intergrate BSS with Sippy RTP Proxy ?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 8451
- Wed Nov 20, 2019 12:15 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Wrong IP in VIA header after session roll over
- Replies: 7
- Views: 14527
- Mon Sep 16, 2019 3:43 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Authenticating a SIP Trunk
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10778
- Fri Aug 30, 2019 11:46 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: BSS Source Port Range for Transport as TCP
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10359
- Wed Aug 21, 2019 3:52 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Rauland R5
- Replies: 2
- Views: 10859
- Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:17 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: BSS Does Not propagate the ACK for 200 from UAC to UAS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14502
Are there any Route header in INIVTE sent from the same UAC? If yes, how many Route headers are they? and are they pointing the SIP Server's IP address? > Do you think, it is causing the issue? I think one Route header for pointing the SIP Server's IP address is no problem. But two.. it might cause ...
- Thu Jun 13, 2019 11:00 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: How to send calls only to server which is alive - OPTIONS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 10813
- Thu Jun 13, 2019 9:52 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: BSS Does Not propagate the ACK for 200 from UAC to UAS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14502
- Thu Jun 06, 2019 5:30 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: BSS Does Not propagate the ACK for 200 from UAC to UAS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14502
It seems ACK was routed based on Route: header what UAC announced.
Add the line below at Deploy Patterns.
Add the line below at Deploy Patterns.
Code: Select all
&net.sip.fixed.addrport.uas = true
- Thu Jun 06, 2019 9:52 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: BSS Does Not propagate the ACK for 200 from UAC to UAS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14502
- Wed Jun 05, 2019 5:45 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: BSS Does Not propagate the ACK for 200 from UAC to UAS
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14502
- Tue Apr 02, 2019 4:07 pm
- Forum: Brekeke PBX Forum
- Topic: Log reason phrase with SIP response codes for failures
- Replies: 6
- Views: 29531
- Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:28 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: 401 Unauthorized Forwarding Registration From SBC
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9073
- Mon Feb 18, 2019 11:32 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Support for SIP/TCP on old SIP-Server
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7523
- Wed Dec 12, 2018 7:07 pm
- Forum: Brekeke PBX Forum
- Topic: Keeping register sip session
- Replies: 5
- Views: 27853
- Wed Dec 12, 2018 6:34 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Failover in Dialplan
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10507
- Tue Dec 11, 2018 1:54 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Failover in Dialplan
- Replies: 10
- Views: 10507
It is not easy but possible.
FYI: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression
A provisional Responses such as 180 is always passed.
Code: Select all
&failover.pattern.response = ^([46]..)|(5[1-9].)|(50[^3])
A provisional Responses such as 180 is always passed.
- Mon Dec 10, 2018 4:33 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Limit on total number of physical network interfaces
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9870
Set them at DeployPatterns.
Code: Select all
$ifsrc = 1.1.1.1
&net.rtp.bindsrc = 1.1.1.1
$ifdst = 2.2.2.1
&net.rtp.binddst = 2.2.2.2
- Thu Dec 06, 2018 6:52 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Limit on total number of physical network interfaces
- Replies: 6
- Views: 9870
- Thu Oct 18, 2018 12:50 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Question on potentially unintentional load balancing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8175
- Thu Oct 18, 2018 11:50 am
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Question on potentially unintentional load balancing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8175
Assigning a SID (Session ID) is different at each SIP Server. Also, depends on how call was ended (rejected or canceled), the Secondary Server keeps status of such ended sessions for a while even if the Primary Server doesn't show them at the Session List (technically Primary Server keep such status ...
- Wed Oct 17, 2018 8:20 pm
- Forum: Brekeke SIP Server Forum
- Topic: Question on potentially unintentional load balancing
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8175