1. Brekeke Product Name and version:2.2.6 PBX
2. Java version:1.5
3. OS type and the version:Debian 4.0r6
4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved:Polycom500, Asterisk Gateway
5. Select your network pattern from http://www.brekeke-sip.com/bbs/network/ ... terns.html :9
6. Your problem:Cannot get Outbound calls to work with ITSP. I did not see my ITSP in the examples.The ITSP only requires a public IP address.They provide a DID for inbound calls. I created a new ARS according to the Manual(basic). I can receive calls in but cannot make calls outbound. The ITSP uses 1nxxnxxxxxx as the only pattern they accept. Matching Pattern Outbound is To sip:(.+)@ Deploy is To sip:$1@my.sipprovider.com. I have accounts registered to the Brekeke evaluation PBX. As my patttern indicates, the Brekeke is on a public IP, the phones are behind nats, this my first attempt to get this working.
ARS Outbound calls
Moderator: Brekeke Support Team
The North American Numbering Plan currently is based on these numbers.
nxxnxxxxxx where n=2-9 and x=0-9
ie nxx=Area Code and nxx + xxxx represents the office code and station number.
I can program pstn central office switches but am having trouble with the "simple expressions" that Brekeke uses.
Customer dials 9 plus 1nxxnxxxxxx to place a call. I want to strip the 9 and send 11 digits to an ITSP.
When I send a call using the above scheme I get 486 busy.
I began working with Nick at Voipwell today, so we may have this issue resolved by the time you read this. If so I really appreciate your quick response, and I will let you know the outcome.
Thanks
Mike
nxxnxxxxxx where n=2-9 and x=0-9
ie nxx=Area Code and nxx + xxxx represents the office code and station number.
I can program pstn central office switches but am having trouble with the "simple expressions" that Brekeke uses.
Customer dials 9 plus 1nxxnxxxxxx to place a call. I want to strip the 9 and send 11 digits to an ITSP.
When I send a call using the above scheme I get 486 busy.
I began working with Nick at Voipwell today, so we may have this issue resolved by the time you read this. If so I really appreciate your quick response, and I will let you know the outcome.
Thanks
Mike