get the number from "TO" OR the "URI"

Izzyg

1. Brekeke Product Name and Version: 2.4.8.6/286.3

2. Java version: 1.6.0_31

3. OS type and the version: Windows Server 2008 R2

4. UA (phone), gateway or other hardware/software involved:

5. Your problem: i need to be able to get the phone number from the TO field as well as from the URI

sometimes carriers will send us the calls to the Brekeke using the number in the TO field and some times int he URI (when they send it in the URI the TO has a differen tnumber, the LRN)

this is my current dial plan examples

Matching Patterns

$request = ^INVITE
To = sip:(.+)@
To = sip:2124588888

Deploy Patterns

$auth = false
To = sip:%1@192.168.1.15
$session = failover sip:%1@192.168.1.15 sip:%1@192.168.1.16
&failover.timer.inviting = 5
&failover.timer.provisional = 360
$continue = false

i want to see the 2124558888 if its int he TO field or int he URI field (doesnt have to be both)

hope · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 862

Izzyg · Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 9:07 am Post subject:

i want to look in the TO or the URI for the number specified in the 3rd entry
"To = sip:2124588888"

if it exists in the TO or the URI then it should be considered legit, and i want to send (Deploy) the number i specified int he "To = sip:2124588888"

hope · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 862

do you want to use 2124588888 in deploy pattern no matter what number is used in the INVITE from caller?

or caller send INVITE request and the number in the INVITE request line is different from the number in the INVITE To header
if so, which number you want to use in deploy pattern?
the number shown in the INVITE request line or the number in the INVITE To header

Izzyg · Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2013 2:22 pm Post subject:

i want to check the Number thats in this line "To=sip:2124588888 "

so if i have
"To=sip:2124447777" then the TO or the URI can have 2124447777

if i have
"To=sip:6178888888" then the TO or URI can have 6178888888

and when i Deploy the call, i want to show the 2124447777 or 6178888888 depends on the "To=sip:xxxxxxxxx"

hope · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 862

Matching Patterns

$request = ^INVITE
To = sip:(.+)@

Deploy Patterns

$auth = false
To = sip:%1@192.168.1.15
$session = failover sip:%1@192.168.1.15 sip:%1@192.168.1.16
&failover.timer.inviting = 5
&failover.timer.provisional = 360
$continue = false

does above dial plan rule work as you need?
how many To headers in the caller INVITE?

Izzyg · Posted: Thu Jul 04, 2013 6:18 am Post subject:

No it wont work
i need to specify the exact number

the dial plan i am using works excellent, i just need to add to check for the information in the TO header like it is doing now,
but i need to add to check what it is checking now, OR if it is int he URI

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

Izzyg,

What does your "URI" mean??
Are you talking about URI in To header?
or are you talking about Request-URI?

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

I've tested it in BSS v3.1.7.8
The rule matches if 2124588888 is in To-URI or Request-URI.

Matching Patterns

$request = ^INVITE
"2124588888" = (.+)
$getUri($request) = sip:(\d*)
$getUri(To) = sip:(\d*)
$or($str.equals("%1","%2"),$str.equals("%1","%3")) = true

Deploy Patterns

$auth = false
To = sip:%1@192.168.1.15
$session = failover sip:%1@192.168.1.15 sip:%1@192.168.1.16
&failover.timer.inviting = 5
&failover.timer.provisional = 360
$continue = false

Izzyg · Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:09 pm Post subject:

i am on Version 2.

should it work fine ?

Izzyg · Posted: Sun Jul 07, 2013 5:16 pm Post subject:

just tested and it seems to work

so i understand and learn, can you explain to me what each line does?

thanks so much

Izzyg · Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 7:15 am Post subject:

whats an easy way to edit multiple dial plans (over 2000) and add the new lines to it ?

Izzyg · Posted: Mon Jul 08, 2013 9:05 am Post subject:

i just had a chance to reach out to the carrier that we had an issue with

they sent us the call, the phone number was only in the Request-Line: INVITE sip:phonenumber@ip:port SIP/2.0

in the To field it had a different number <sip:wrongnumber@ip>

and the brekeke rejected the call, i assume because it didnt find the phonenumber in the URI?

is that above rule you asked me to use looking for the phonenumber in the To OR in the Request-URI ?

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

Yes

---------------------------------------
$request = ^INVITE
"phonenumber" = (.+)
$getUri($request) = sip:(\d*)
$getUri(To) = sip:(\d*)
$or($str.equals("%1","%2"),$str.equals("%1","%3")) = true
---------------------------------------

The above definition will be fulfilled if phonenumber is shown in Request-Line or To header

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

> whats an easy way to edit multiple dial plans (over 2000) and add the new lines to it ?

If you use Alias, you don't have to create multiple rules if they look same.

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

> so i understand and learn, can you explain to me what each line does?

$request = ^INVITE
if Request-Line is INVITE

"2124588888" = (.+)
2124588888 --> %1

$getUri($request) = sip:(\d*)
Request-URI's digits --> %2

$getUri(To) = sip:(\d*)
To-URI's digits --> %3

$or($str.equals("%1","%2"),$str.equals("%1","%3")) = true
if %1 is same as %2 -or- %2 is same as %3

Izzyg · Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:29 am Post subject:

$request = ^INVITE
if Request-Line is INVITE

"2124588888" = (.+)
2124588888 --> %1

$getUri($request) = sip:(\d*)
Request-URI's digits --> %2

$getUri(To) = sip:(\d*)
To-URI's digits --> %3

$or($str.equals("%1","%2"),$str.equals("%1","%3")) = true
if %1 is same as %2 -or- %2 is same as %

what i want the rule to be, if %1 is same as %2 or %3

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

$or($str.equals("%1","%2"),$str.equals("%1","%3")) = true
correction: if %1 is same as %2 -or- %1 is same as %3

Let you test yourself.

Izzyg · Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:37 am Post subject:

i tried it earlier and ti didnt work

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

Use Brekeke SIP Server 3.1

Izzyg · Posted: Tue Jul 09, 2013 11:48 am Post subject:

is it possible to get it working in V2?
not sure if i want to buy a license just for this option ?

ambrosio · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 215

I tested the above dialplan definition in ver 3.1.7.8.
I don't have v2.

You can download an evaluation version from brekeke's web.

Izzyg · Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 9:02 am Post subject:

can anyone advise how to do it in V2?

Tata · Brekeke Master Guru Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 223

Have you tested the above dialplan rule but didn't work?

Izzyg · Posted: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:10 am Post subject:

thats correct